Monthly Archiv: October, 2017

3 New Free Screen and Computer Game Recorders

I have added 3 more programs to the Free Screen Video Recorders, Game Recorders and Screen Capture Software page. Two of them can even capture your computer game-playing sessions, while the 3rd sports an incredibly simple user-interface that even a novice will find easy (useful for quick recordings to show a friend or relative how to do something).

Very simple page details

Package:
Very simple page details
Summary:
Parse and extract Web page information details
Groups:
HTML, Parsers, PHP 5
Author:
zinsou A.A.E.Moïse
Description:
This class can parse and extract Web page information details...

Read more at https://www.phpclasses.org/package/10489-PHP-Parse-and-extract-Web-page-information-details.html#2017-10-14-03:04:46

Analysts See $2.03 EPS for Ingredion (INGR); Shorts at …

<!–

Market News

–>

October 12, 2017 – By Vivian Currie

NUTRAFUELS (OTCMKTS:NTFU) had a decrease of 81.29% in short interest. NTFU’s SI was 6,400 shares in October as released by FINRA. Its down 81.29% from 34,200 shares previously. With 40,200 avg volume, 0 days are for NUTRAFUELS (OTCMKTS:NTFU)’s short sellers to cover NTFU’s short positions. About 26,255 shares traded. NutraFuels Inc (OTCMKTS:NTFU) has 0.00% since October 12, 2016 and is . It has underperformed by 16.70% the SP500.

Analysts expect Ingredion Inc (NYSE:INGR) to report $2.03 EPS on November, 1.They anticipate $0.07 EPS change or 3.57% from last quarter’s $1.96 EPS. INGR’s profit would be $144.78 million giving it 15.13 P/E if the $2.03 EPS is correct. After having $1.89 EPS previously, Ingredion Inc’s analysts see 7.41% EPS growth. About 91,235 shares traded. Ingredion Inc (NYSE:INGR) has declined 2.30% since October 12, 2016 and is downtrending. It has underperformed by 19.00% the SP500.

Investors sentiment increased to 0.95 in 2017 Q2. Its up 0.06, from 0.89 in 2017Q1. It increased, as 32 investors sold Ingredion Inc shares while 161 reduced holdings. 42 funds opened positions while 142 raised stakes. 59.36 million shares or 0.37% less from 59.58 million shares in 2017Q1 were reported. Fny Managed Accounts Ltd Liability Corporation holds 0.42% of its portfolio in Ingredion Inc (NYSE:INGR) for 354 shares. Waddell Reed holds 0.09% or 342,262 shares in its portfolio. Da Davidson accumulated 0% or 840 shares. Creative Planning invested in 6,624 shares or 0% of the stock. Airain Ltd owns 6,437 shares. Cap Fund Mgmt Sa invested in 0.01% or 6,100 shares. Apg Asset Mgmt Nv holds 0.1% or 469,150 shares in its portfolio. Kames Capital Public Limited has 545,723 shares. Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo Lc has invested 0.06% of its portfolio in Ingredion Inc (NYSE:INGR). Strategic Glob Advisors Limited Liability Corp has 0.7% invested in Ingredion Inc (NYSE:INGR). Ronald Blue Lc stated it has 0.01% in Ingredion Inc (NYSE:INGR). Denver Investment Advsrs Limited has 28,866 shares. 132,370 are owned by Ny State Teachers Retirement Systems. Alliancebernstein Limited Partnership invested in 0.04% or 391,195 shares. Fincl Bank Of Montreal Can holds 78,875 shares or 0.01% of its portfolio.

Among 7 analysts covering Ingredion Inc (NYSE:INGR), 4 have Buy rating, 1 Sell and 2 Hold. Therefore 57% are positive. Ingredion Inc had 18 analyst reports since August 3, 2015 according to SRatingsIntel. The stock has “Hold” rating by BMO Capital Markets on Wednesday, August 2. The rating was maintained by BMO Capital Markets on Thursday, April 13 with “Hold”. As per Wednesday, December 16, the company rating was initiated by Jefferies. BMO Capital Markets maintained the stock with “Hold” rating in Wednesday, September 27 report. The stock of Ingredion Inc (NYSE:INGR) has “Market Perform” rating given on Friday, October 30 by BMO Capital Markets. The rating was maintained by BMO Capital Markets with “Hold” on Monday, June 26. The firm has “Overweight” rating by Stephens given on Friday, January 29. The stock of Ingredion Inc (NYSE:INGR) has “Buy” rating given on Monday, September 25 by Jefferies. The firm has “Buy” rating given on Wednesday, June 15 by Citigroup. The stock of Ingredion Inc (NYSE:INGR) earned “Buy” rating by Jefferies on Wednesday, June 14.

Ingredion Incorporated is an ingredients solutions provider. The company has market cap of $8.76 billion. The Firm makes and sells sweetener, starches, nutrition ingredients and biomaterial solutions derived from the wet milling and processing of corn and other starch materials to a range of industries, both domestically and internationally. It has a 18.48 P/E ratio. It operates through four divisions: North America, South America, Asia Pacific, and Europe, Middle East and Africa .

NutraFuels, Inc. manufactures and distributes oral spray nutritional and dietary products. The company has market cap of $18.36 million. The Company’s oral spray products are designed to provide more absorption than capsules or liquid formulas. It currently has negative earnings. The Company’s products include NutraFuels sleep spray; NutraFuels Energy Spray; NutraFuels Garcinia Cambogia Spray; NutraFuels Headache and Pain Spray, and NutraFuels Hair, Skin and Nails Spray.

Receive News Ratings Via Email – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings with our daily email newsletter.

Article source: https://utahherald.com/analysts-see-2-03-eps-for-ingredion-ingr-shorts-at-nutrafuels-ntfu-lowered-by-81-29/

MARKETPLACE: Too good to be true

Marketplace has received hundreds of emails from viewers who’ve been stung by surprise credit card charges after signing up for what they thought were “risk-free” product trials endorsed by respected celebrities like Ellen Degeneres, Celine Dion and the stars of CBC’s Dragons’ Den. While thinking they signed up for a free trial offer, thousands of Canadians found themselves trapped in a subscription scheme. These schemes use fine print and deceptive marketing techniques, including fake articles, bogus endorsements and phoney surveys from legitimate companies, to trick people into paying for products and services they don’t want.

The scam starts with a merchant who decides to sell a product online, whether it is face cream, garcinia cambogia, weight loss pills or teeth-whitening products. As the U.S.-based Federal Trade Commission has pointed out, the products used in subscription traps are largely irrelevant; the primary purpose, after all, is to acquire credit card numbers, not to improve people’s complexions.

The merchant then creates a website offering free trials of the product. Underneath the promise of a free trial, the merchant will place recurring fees in the fine print of buried Terms and Conditions, hidden at the bottom of the page in a hyperlink. After what is usually a 14-day trial period, customers automatically become enrolled in monthly subscriptions if they don’t cancel, and their credit card can get billed hundreds of dollars every few months.

And it gets even more confusing for consumers trying to get their money back. The merchants are constantly changing their product names to avoid bad online reviews, according to Better Business Bureau. The RCMP’s Anti-Fraud unit told Marketplace they have linked 371 different product names to this subscription trap.

As the merchants need advertising to direct people to their offers, they then harness the power of what’s called affiliate marketing.

Affiliate marketers promote products on the Internet using blogs, websites, articles, and banners. While affiliate marketing is used legitimately, and ethically, for all kinds of Internet advertising for big corporations, some affiliate marketing practices often rely on deceptive and misleading practices.

These affiliate marketers often create fake news articles that use well-known celebrity names or phoney pop-up surveys that appear to come from trusted sources such as Costco, Air Canada and Rogers.

In these kinds of subscription traps, both the merchant and the affiliate marketer could be held responsible; the merchant for hiding the charges and the affiliate marketer for creating misleading advertising.

Marketplace tracks down a Canadian merchant and reveals how you can avoid getting tricked tonight at 8 p.m. (8:30 in NL) on CBC. 

Article source: http://www.toronto24hours.ca/2017/10/13/marketplace-too-good-to-be-true

RCMP says free trial scams are fraudulent, but credit card companies make victims pay

Every week, Marketplace receives dozens of emails from Canadians telling us about all kinds of consumer concerns and deceptive schemes.

Renovation ripoffs.

Moving company mishaps.

Dubious drugstore remedies.  

But there’s one scam that has generated more angry emails than all the rest: the not-so-free face cream trial.

Marketplace has received hundreds of emails from viewers who’ve been stung by surprise credit card charges they couldn’t get reversed after signing up for what they thought were “risk-free” product trials.

  • WATCH| MARKETPLACE reveals how you can avoid subscription traps Friday at 8 p.m. (8:30 p.m. in N.L.) on CBC 

What they actually signed up for is an online scheme known as a subscription trap, which uses sneaky fine print and deceptive marketing techniques, such as fake articles, bogus endorsements from respected celebrities like Ellen DeGeneres and Céline Dion and phoney surveys from legitimate companies, to trick people into paying for products and services they don’t want.

Marketplace has uncovered exactly how it works, including the motives and methods of the mysterious merchants and marketers involved; why it continues to work despite more than 26,000 complaints to the Better Business Bureau in the last year alone; and what credit card companies could do to stop it.

Costly terms

Judy Mayer of Aurora, Ont., is one of those Canadians who paid a steep price for signing up for what appeared to be a great offer.

Mayer was on Facebook back in January when she noticed an ad for an anti-aging cream featuring an endorsement from Dragons’ Den star Arlene Dickinson. Mayer paid the shipping in order to get the “free trial.”

‘I had no idea that I was to cancel a subscription.’
– Judy Mayer

A few months later, Mayer discovered charges totalling nearly $400 on her Mastercard. The charges were from Rejuva Essence, so she called the company’s customer service line and was told that because she hadn’t cancelled her subscription and returned the original sample within 14 days, she was charged for three more bottles, as set out in the offer’s terms and conditions.

“I had no idea that I was to cancel a subscription,” Mayer told Marketplace. “They did not tell me anything about it.”

Mayer insists she never saw any mention of a 14-day trial period and the recurring charges when she signed up for the offer — which is precisely the goal of a subscription trap, authorities say.

When Marketplace’s Asha Tomlinson called Rejuva Essence’s customer service, she was told “once you place the order, you start the trial period. If the trial period passes and you haven’t cancelled, the system believes you wish to continue your treatment.”

When Tomlinson pointed out those details weren’t easy to find, she was told “those are the terms and the conditions” and they’re outlined on the Rejuva Essence website.

As with other face cream offers, details about Rejuva Essence’s recurring charges and trial period are accessible only via a small, faint “Terms” hyperlink at the bottom of the page.

Mastercard told Mayer it was “very aware” of these face cream companies, but there was nothing it could do because the additional charges were explained on Rejuva Essence’s website.

And, as Marketplace has learned, Mayer’s experience is far from unique.

How the scam works

The scam starts with a merchant who decides to sell a product online, whether it’s face cream, garcinia cambogia, weight-loss pills or teeth-whitening products. As the U.S.-based Federal Trade Commission has pointed out, the products used in subscription traps are largely irrelevant; the primary purpose, after all, is to acquire credit card numbers.

The merchant creates a website or landing/checkout page offering free trials of, in this case, anti-aging face cream. The merchant then buries the recurring fees in the fine print of the terms and conditions. After what is usually a 14-day trial period, the customer automatically becomes enrolled in a subscription if they don’t cancel, and their credit card gets billed every month, sometimes for hundreds of dollars.

subtrap

Sample of a merchant website with recurring fees found within the terms and conditions hyperlink.

The merchants are constantly changing their product names to avoid bad online reviews, according to the RCMP’s anti-fraud unit and the Better Business Bureau. Abella Mayfair, Image Revive, Face Replen, Hydroluxe, Chantel St Claire, Renuvica, Nuvella and Skin Balance are just some of the 371 product names the Mounties have uncovered.

RCMP fraud investigator Jeff Thomson says the merchants will also use different bank processor names on credit card statements. He says authorities have found more than 312 accounts linked to the scheme at 84 different banks in 14 different countries, particularly in China, Latvia, the U.S. and Canada.

Door-to-door salespeople of the internet

But the sellers also need advertising to direct people to their offers, so they harness the power of what’s called affiliate marketing.

Sometimes referred to as the door-to-door salespeople of the internet, cost-per-action (CPA) affiliate marketers are often a creative and highly motivated bunch since they don’t get paid unless you sign up for whatever offer they’re pushing.

Marketplace has found commissions for CPA affiliate marketers ranging from $30 to $50 for promoting and getting people to sign up for face cream trials.

affiliatejobs

Merchants place job offers like these for CPA affiliate marketers on affiliate network websites.

While many affiliate marketers do legitimate and ethical work for upstanding businesses, authorities say some CPA affiliate marketers use deceptive tools like fake news articles with phoney celebrity endorsements, or fake pop-up surveys that appear to come from reputable sources such as Costco, Air Canada and Rogers, to catch people in subscription traps.

Arlene Dickinson of Dragons’ Den told Marketplace she felt physically sick when she discovered her name was being used to promote face cream products she knew nothing about.

“It was horrible,” Dickinson said. “To use my image and to lure people in, it is just reprehensible.”

Dickinson

Dragons’ Den star Arlene Dickinson was appalled when she learned her name was being used to promote face cream products she knew nothing about. (CBC)

Dickinson’s lawyers told her they couldn’t stop it because they couldn’t find those responsible.

“They’re changing addresses, locations, even their website is changed on a regular basis, so … they’re slick,” she said.

“I think the people running these scams are crooks, they’re hucksters … that is not entrepreneurial, that’s just pure opportunistic bullshit.”

What does the law say?

There are laws on the books that, at least in theory, should protect Canadians from subscription traps.

Sections 74.01 and 52 of the Competition Act outlaw misleading advertising, which can include deceptive marketing as well as “recurring charges” in the terms and conditions.

In the case of face cream trials, it’s misleading for consumers to see the word “free” everywhere and then discover there are hidden charges — the overall impression is the offer is for a free trial.

In these kinds of subscription traps, both the merchant and the affiliate marketer can be held responsible; the merchant for hiding the charges and the affiliate marketer for creating misleading advertising.

But Barry Elliott of the RCMP’s anti-fraud unit says finding and policing those merchants and marketers is no easy task.

“As far as an investigator putting this package together, it would take a lot of work, and getting all the information from the other countries, everything, would be a nightmare — and they know that,” Elliott said. “Those responsible have figured how to make this thing as difficult as possible for us to track down.”

Role of credit card companies

Compounding the frustration for victims is the fact credit companies rarely reverse the charges.

Most of the consumers who contacted Marketplace about the scam, including Mayer, failed to get their money back.

Both Visa and Mastercard told Marketplace that cardholders will not be charged for fraudulent transactions through their zero liability policies, but unlike the RCMP’s anti-fraud unit and the Competition Bureau, they don’t seem to consider subscription traps to be fraudulent.

Mastercard’s customer service told a Marketplace producer that consumers are responsible for finding any charges that may be listed in the terms and conditions, even if they’re in “difficult places to see.”

But Elliott says credit card companies should stop blaming cardholders and holding them responsible for the recurring charges hidden in the terms and conditions.

“I have to give up my house, I have to give up my newborn child, I have to murder someone because I clicked on the terms and conditions? I mean it becomes ridiculous,” the Mountie said.

‘If the banks and credit card companies eliminated this option, it could all be over.’
– Jeff Thomson, RCMP anti-fraud unit

Marketplace asked Mastercard and Visa why they continue to hold cardholders responsible, given that the Competition Bureau and the RCMP consider subscription traps to be fraudulent.

Mastercard Canada declined a request for an interview, but said in a statement that “cardholders should carefully read terms and conditions of any offer.”

Visa Canada had similar advice, suggesting cardholders “look for buried terms and conditions that may bind you to recurring payments or make cancellations/returns difficult.” The company also said refund decisions are managed by card-issuers, such as TD and Scotiabank, and not Visa Canada.

Visa Canada did say credit card companies are “responsible for ensuring that their merchants are properly disclosing their Terms Conditions and address any merchants that are generating excessive disputes as a result.”

This policy hasn’t seemed to help many cardholders, however.

The authority to make sure recurring charges aren’t simply listed in the terms and conditions means credit card companies could have the power to end subscription traps, said Jeff Thomson of the RCMP’s anti-fraud unit.

“If the banks and credit card companies eliminated this option, it could all be over.”

Article source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/marketplace-skin-cream-trials-1.4349777

Powered by Gewgley